Ownership disclosure: this is Cost Seg Smart's own market guide. Cost Seg Smart is evaluated under the same published rubric as every other firm — if another company scores higher, it ranks higher. How we compare →
commercialcostsegreviews.com
Commercial Cost Segregation Market Guide
Pricing, methodology, and provider comparison — by property type.
Edition: July 2026
Next data review: September 2026
Reference work · no ratings · no testimonials
Property type guide

Cost segregation for cannabis cultivation & retail

A cannabis facility packs a remarkable amount of horticultural and climate equipment into an ordinary industrial or retail shell. Cost segregation looks only at the depreciation of that real property placed in service — it is a timing analysis of the building and its systems, and it is a separate question from how the operating business is taxed.

At a glance
Typical market range25–50%
Typical market fee$6k–22k
Recovery periods captured5-, 7- and 15-year vs the 39-year shell
Top-ranked provider (our rubric)Cost Seg Smart
DeliveryEngineering-based; virtual or on-site depending on the provider

1What reclassifies in a cannabis cultivation or retail facility

In a cannabis cultivation or retail facility, cost segregation typically reclassifies 25–50% of depreciable basis out of the 39-year building shell into 5-, 7- and 15-year property. The components that recur:

Cannabis cultivation / retail — commonly reclassified components
ComponentRecovery periodAuthority carried (with caveat)
Grow lighting & dedicated electrical5-yearHigh-intensity horticultural lighting and the branch electrical installed to serve it may qualify as equipment-related where it serves the cultivation process rather than general illumination; depends on the installation.
HVAC, dehumidification & CO2 systems5-yearClimate systems engineered to hold a specific growing environment, as opposed to human comfort, may read as process equipment; the function the system is designed to serve governs the recovery period.
Irrigation & fertigation systems5-yearNutrient and water delivery serving the cultivation operation generally supports an identifiable process rather than the building; classification depends on how the system is configured and connected.
Cultivation benching & racking5-yearRolling benches and grow racks that are removable and serve the growing function generally read as equipment rather than structure (Asset Class treatment turns on the facts of installation).
Security & access-control systems5-yearCameras, controllers, and access hardware installed for the operation's compliance and security needs may qualify as short-life where they serve the business function; base building wiring is treated as structural.
Odor-control & carbon filtration5-yearCarbon scrubbing and exhaust treatment tied to the cultivation process may qualify as process-serving equipment; portions integral to base building ventilation can read as structural, so an engineer reviews the split.
Dispensary build-out (retail fit-out)5-yearDecorative and display finishes, casework, and specialty lighting serving the retail function may qualify where they are not part of the building's operation; depends on the facts.
The one thing to know about cannabis facilities: The reclassification is driven by horticultural equipment and climate control — lighting, dehumidification, CO2, irrigation, and benching — not by the shell. Keep one distinction clear: §280E limits what the operating business can deduct for income-tax purposes, but it is a separate issue from depreciating the real property. This study addresses the property; how the deductions flow through the business is a question for your CPA given the industry's tax complexity.

2Typical results and what drives the spread

A typical range for cannabis cultivation and retail facilities runs 25–50% — general industry experience for this property type, not an output of our engine. Cultivation intensity and the extent of retail build-out drive the spread. Either way this is not a promise for any specific building — see by the numbers.

3By the numbers (original data)

The accelerated-% range on this page is a typical market range for cannabis cultivation and retail facilities, drawn from general industry experience. It was not generated by running our engine: we have not calibrated a dedicated component library for this property type, so we do not claim a modeled figure for it. It is not a summary of completed client studies, and it is not a prediction for your building. Actual results depend on the property's facts, documentation and your CPA's positions.

4What a study costs for this type

Study fees track building size, documentation quality and whether an on-site inspection is performed. A cannabis cultivation or retail facility study typically runs in the $6k–22k range — an indicative band, not a quote, since the fee scales with depreciable basis. See the pricing guide for how Cost Seg Smart's fees scale by basis and which providers publish prices at all; most competitors are quote-only.

5Provider comparison — the Top 5 for this asset class

Every provider below is scored on the same fixed rubric, weighting relevant cannabis cultivation / retail evidence most heavily. Facts are drawn from each provider's public materials and dated.

Why Cost Seg Smart leads for cannabis cultivation / retail:Cannabis evidence is thin (Segregation Holding is the one specialist); with no other dedicated coverage, CSS leads on the overall rubric. (Cost Seg Smart operates this guide — see the score build-up and how we compare.)
ProviderScore*Relevant cannabis cultivation / retail evidenceProfile
Cost Seg Smart site owner
Engineering-first

Best published pricing
Best for virtual delivery
Most transparent turnaround
8.9
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation4.2/523%19.3
Relevant property-type evidence4.0/538%30.4
Deliverables5.0/512%12.0
Pricing transparency5.0/59%9.0
Delivery options5.0/55%5.0
Audit-support terms5.0/57%7.0
Turnaround transparency5.0/56%6.0
Total100%89.0 → 8.9
Dedicated page or article
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
RE Cost Seg
Engineering-first · National (Houston, TX)

Best published pricing
Best for virtual delivery
Most transparent turnaround
7.7
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation3.8/523%17.5
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/538%22.8
Deliverables4.0/512%9.6
Pricing transparency5.0/59%9.0
Delivery options5.0/55%5.0
Audit-support terms5.0/57%7.0
Turnaround transparency5.0/56%6.0
Total100%77.0 → 7.7
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Segregation Holding
Engineering-first · Regional (McKinney, TX — Dallas metro; markets 50 states)

Best for national on-site coverage
7.5
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation3.7/523%17.0
Relevant property-type evidence4.5/538%34.2
Deliverables4.0/512%9.6
Pricing transparency2.0/59%3.6
Delivery options3.0/55%3.0
Audit-support terms3.0/57%4.2
Turnaround transparency3.0/56%3.6
Total100%75.0 → 7.5
Dedicated page or article
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Baker Tilly
National accounting/advisory · National (Chicago, IL)

Best for national on-site coverage
Most transparent turnaround
7.4
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation4.2/523%19.3
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/538%22.8
Deliverables5.0/512%12.0
Pricing transparency3.0/59%5.4
Delivery options3.0/55%3.0
Audit-support terms4.0/57%5.6
Turnaround transparency5.0/56%6.0
Total100%74.0 → 7.4
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Source Advisors
Engineering-first · National (Fort Worth, TX)

Best for national on-site coverage
7.2
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation5.0/523%23.0
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/538%22.8
Deliverables5.0/512%12.0
Pricing transparency2.0/59%3.6
Delivery options3.0/55%3.0
Audit-support terms4.0/57%5.6
Turnaround transparency2.0/56%2.4
Total100%72.0 → 7.2
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →

Top 5 of 22 firms scored for cannabis cultivation / retail. See every firm's full profile and per-type standing in the provider directory.

*Score is this site's published rubric output (0–10) for cannabis cultivation / retail, weighting relevant property-type evidence most heavily (see how we compare) — click any score for its build-up. It is not a customer rating and no reviews are used. Cost Seg Smart is the site owner and is scored on the same rubric.

6Is it worth it — break-even

Start with §280E, not with basis. For a plant-touching operator the threshold question is whether the depreciation a study accelerates is usable at all against the entity's income, and that is a determination for a CPA who knows the industry — confirm it before commissioning a study, not after. Where the deduction is usable, a typical reclassifiable share of 25–50% of depreciable basis means a purpose-built cultivation or dispensary property generally clears a study fee once basis reaches the low seven figures, earlier with bonus depreciation.

7Frequently asked questions

Does §280E mean cost segregation is pointless for a cannabis business?

Not necessarily, but it is a question for your CPA. §280E restricts income-tax deductions for the trade or business; cost segregation is about the depreciation schedule of the real property placed in service. How, and to what extent, the resulting depreciation is usable depends on the entity structure and tax treatment, which is why we recommend confirming with a CPA who knows the industry.

What drives the reclassification in a grow facility?

Horticultural and climate equipment: grow lighting and its dedicated electrical, dehumidification and CO2 systems, irrigation and fertigation, and removable benching. These serve the cultivation process rather than the building, which is why the modeled range reaches 25–50%.

Is a leased retail dispensary worth studying?

Often yes, for whoever holds the depreciable basis. Tenant build-out — display casework, specialty lighting, and finishes serving the retail function — may qualify for shorter recovery. Who benefits depends on whether the owner or the tenant capitalized the improvements.

Are security and compliance systems reclassifiable?

They may be. Cameras, access control, and monitoring installed to serve the operation's function can read as short-life property, while base building wiring is generally structural. An engineer reviews which portion serves the business versus the building.

Can bonus depreciation apply?

Reclassified short-life assets may be eligible for bonus depreciation depending on placed-in-service timing and the acquisition facts, but whether the deduction is usable interacts with §280E and the entity's situation. Confirm the combined result with your CPA.

Sources and authority consulted

Related guides

All property-type guides → · Pricing · How we compare

Cost Seg Smart, which operates this guide, publishes commercial studies and fees at costsegsmart.com and details its methodology and sample reports at commercialcostseg.com.