Ownership disclosure: this is Cost Seg Smart's own market guide. Cost Seg Smart is evaluated under the same published rubric as every other firm — if another company scores higher, it ranks higher. How we compare →
commercialcostsegreviews.com
Commercial Cost Segregation Market Guide
Pricing, methodology, and provider comparison — by property type.
Edition: July 2026
Next data review: September 2026
Reference work · no ratings · no testimonials
Property type guide

Cost segregation for marinas

A marina's basis lives at the water's edge. Floating and fixed docks, the power and water pedestals that serve each slip, fuel systems, and boat-handling equipment are the assets that generate revenue, and they carry classifications quite different from an upland building. The recurring caution is jurisdictional: the submerged land under the slips is non-depreciable, so the study has to attach value to the improvements above and around it, not the bottom itself. Across these properties the reclassified share commonly reaches 25–45%.

At a glance
Typical market range25–45%
Typical market fee$6k–22k
Recovery periods captured5-, 7- and 15-year vs the 39-year shell
Top-ranked provider (our rubric)Cost Seg Smart
DeliveryEngineering-based; virtual or on-site depending on the provider
Choosing a provider for this asset class?
Top 5 providers for marinas →

1What reclassifies in a marina

In a marina, cost segregation typically reclassifies 25–45% of depreciable basis out of the 39-year building shell into 5-, 7- and 15-year property. The components that recur:

Marina — commonly reclassified components
ComponentRecovery periodAuthority carried (with caveat)
Floating & fixed docks, piers, and gangways15-year / 5-yearFixed piers are generally 15-year land improvements (Asset Class 00.3); floating dock systems may qualify differently depending on whether they function as improvements or as equipment. The mooring method and permanence drive the determination — engineer review.
Slip utility pedestals — power & water5-year / 15-yearMetered power and water pedestals serving individual slips may qualify as shorter-life property; the trunk distribution to them can be a 15-year land improvement. Separate the service pedestals from the buried mains.
Fuel systems & dispensers5- or 15-yearTanks, piping and dispensers generally function as equipment serving the fueling operation, but petroleum-marketing improvements can fall in a 15-year class on the facts — the same question our gas-station guide raises. Engineer and CPA review, not an automatic short-life booking.
Boat lifts & travel-lift equipment5-yearHoists, boat lifts, and travel-lift machinery are generally personal property (equipment) where they function as movable handling systems rather than fixed structure. Present only where the marina operates haul-out service.
Bulkheads, seawalls & shoreline stabilization15-yearMay qualify as land improvements (Asset Class 00.3) where they are constructed shoreline structures; portions integral to the land may not. This is a judgment call warranting engineer review, and the submerged land itself stays non-depreciable.
Upland paving & site lighting15-yearParking, boat-storage yard paving, and pole-mounted site lighting generally qualify as land improvements; fixtures wired into a building follow the structure. Scales with upland site area.
The one thing to know about marinas: Docks, slip utilities, and fuel systems dominate the study — the floating and fixed dock network, the metered power and water pedestals, and the fuel storage and dispensing equipment are where the shorter-life value concentrates. The hard boundary is that the submerged land beneath the slips stays non-depreciable, so the analysis attaches value to the constructed improvements above the water, which is what keeps an honest result inside the 25–45% band.

2Typical results and what drives the spread

A typical range for marinas runs 25–45% — general industry experience for this property type, not an output of our engine. Bulkheads, seawalls, and floating docks turn on mooring method and permanence, so their classification is checked item by item in our internal technical review & QC rather than assumed, and the submerged land is carved out before any figure is set. Either way this is not a promise for any specific building — see by the numbers.

3By the numbers (original data)

The accelerated-% range on this page is a typical market range for marinas, drawn from general industry experience. It was not generated by running our engine: we have not calibrated a dedicated component library for this property type, so we do not claim a modeled figure for it. It is not a summary of completed client studies, and it is not a prediction for your building. Actual results depend on the property's facts, documentation and your CPA's positions.

4What a study costs for this type

Study fees track building size, documentation quality and whether an on-site inspection is performed. A marina study typically runs in the $6k–22k range — an indicative band, not a quote, since the fee scales with depreciable basis. See the pricing guide for how Cost Seg Smart's fees scale by basis and which providers publish prices at all; most competitors are quote-only.

5Provider comparison — the Top 5 for this asset class

Every provider below is scored on the same fixed rubric, weighting relevant marina evidence most heavily. Facts are drawn from each provider's public materials and dated.

Why Cost Seg Smart leads for marina:A dedicated marina page covering slip utilities, fuel systems and the floating-versus-fixed dock distinction, with published pricing and turnaround; CSSI holds the one named marina case study in this comparison, which is real documented work our page does not claim to match. (Cost Seg Smart operates this guide — see the score build-up and how we compare.)
ProviderScore*Relevant marina evidenceProfile
Cost Seg Smart site owner
Engineering-first

Best published pricing
Best for virtual delivery
Most transparent turnaround
8.9
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation4.2/523%19.3
Relevant property-type evidence4.0/538%30.4
Deliverables5.0/512%12.0
Pricing transparency5.0/59%9.0
Delivery options5.0/55%5.0
Audit-support terms5.0/57%7.0
Turnaround transparency5.0/56%6.0
Total100%89.0 → 8.9
Dedicated page or article
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
CSSI
Engineering-first · National (Baton Rouge, LA)

Best for national on-site coverage
8.1
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation3.9/523%17.9
Relevant property-type evidence5.0/538%38.0
Deliverables4.0/512%9.6
Pricing transparency2.0/59%3.6
Delivery options3.0/55%3.0
Audit-support terms4.0/57%5.6
Turnaround transparency3.0/56%3.6
Total100%81.0 → 8.1
Dedicated page / named case study
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
RE Cost Seg
Engineering-first · National (Houston, TX)

Best published pricing
Best for virtual delivery
Most transparent turnaround
7.7
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation3.8/523%17.5
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/538%22.8
Deliverables4.0/512%9.6
Pricing transparency5.0/59%9.0
Delivery options5.0/55%5.0
Audit-support terms5.0/57%7.0
Turnaround transparency5.0/56%6.0
Total100%77.0 → 7.7
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Baker Tilly
National accounting/advisory · National (Chicago, IL)

Best for national on-site coverage
Most transparent turnaround
7.4
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation4.2/523%19.3
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/538%22.8
Deliverables5.0/512%12.0
Pricing transparency3.0/59%5.4
Delivery options3.0/55%3.0
Audit-support terms4.0/57%5.6
Turnaround transparency5.0/56%6.0
Total100%74.0 → 7.4
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Source Advisors
Engineering-first · National (Fort Worth, TX)

Best for national on-site coverage
7.2
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation5.0/523%23.0
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/538%22.8
Deliverables5.0/512%12.0
Pricing transparency2.0/59%3.6
Delivery options3.0/55%3.0
Audit-support terms4.0/57%5.6
Turnaround transparency2.0/56%2.4
Total100%72.0 → 7.2
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →

Top 5 of 22 firms scored for marina. See every firm's full profile and per-type standing in the provider directory.

*Score is this site's published rubric output (0–10) for marina, weighting relevant property-type evidence most heavily (see how we compare) — click any score for its build-up. It is not a customer rating and no reviews are used. Cost Seg Smart is the site owner and is scored on the same rubric.

6Is it worth it — break-even

The present-value benefit generally clears a study fee once depreciable basis reaches the low-to-mid seven figures, with docks, pedestals, and fuel systems supplying much of the shorter-life basis, and earlier where bonus depreciation applies. It is weakest where a near-term sale triggers §1245 recapture on the equipment, or where much of the site proves to be non-depreciable submerged land.

7Frequently asked questions

Is the water or submerged land depreciable?

No. The submerged land beneath the slips is non-depreciable, like any land. The depreciable value attaches to the constructed improvements above and around it — docks, pedestals, fuel systems, bulkheads — so the study carves out the bottom before assigning any figure inside the 25–45% band.

How are floating docks classified?

It depends on how they function. Fixed piers are generally 15-year land improvements, while floating dock systems may be treated differently depending on whether they operate as improvements or as movable equipment. The mooring method and permanence drive the call, which is why it takes engineer review.

What about the fuel system?

Fuel storage tanks, piping, and dock dispensers generally function as equipment serving the fueling operation and may qualify as 5-year property, while environmental containment structures are assessed separately. The determination is item-specific rather than a single blanket treatment.

Are bulkheads and seawalls faster-depreciating?

They may qualify as 15-year land improvements where they are constructed shoreline structures, but portions integral to the land itself may not. Because the line between a structure and the land is fact-specific here, seawalls and bulkheads warrant engineer review rather than an automatic classification.

Does marina equipment face recapture on sale?

Yes. Gain attributable to the reclassified §1245 equipment — boat lifts, fuel dispensers, and similar — is generally recaptured as ordinary income when the marina is sold, separate from §1250 building gain. That makes the strategy strongest for a longer hold and weaker where a sale is near.

Sources and authority consulted

Related guides

All property-type guides → · Pricing · How we compare

Cost Seg Smart, which operates this guide, publishes commercial studies and fees at costsegsmart.com and details its methodology and sample reports at commercialcostseg.com.