Ownership disclosure: this is Cost Seg Smart's own market guide. Cost Seg Smart is evaluated under the same published rubric as every other firm — if another company scores higher, it ranks higher. How we compare →
commercialcostsegreviews.com
Commercial Cost Segregation Market Guide
Pricing, methodology, and provider comparison — by property type.
Edition: July 2026
Next data review: September 2026
Reference work · no ratings · no testimonials
Property type guide

Cost segregation for mixed-use buildings

A mixed-use building is really two or three properties stacked on one parcel, and the reclassification blends by area. A short-life-rich retail or restaurant ground floor pulls the number up; conservative upper-floor residential finishes pull it down. That is why the modeled range is wide — 5–32%, centering around 12% — and why the discipline is in weighting each use by gross building area rather than reaching for a single figure.

At a glance
Modeled reclass range5–32% (central ~12%)
Typical study fee (Cost Seg Smart)From $1,995
Recovery periods captured5-, 7- and 15-year vs the 39-year shell
DeliveryEngineering-based; virtual or on-site depending on the provider
Choosing a provider for this asset class?
Top 5 providers for mixed-uses →

1What reclassifies in a mixed-use buildings

In a mixed-use, cost segregation typically reclassifies 5–32% of depreciable basis out of the 39-year building shell into 5-, 7- and 15-year property (modeled central tendency near ~12%). The components that recur:

Mixed-use — commonly reclassified components
ComponentRecovery periodAuthority carried (with caveat)
Ground-floor retail/restaurant build-out — storefronts, dedicated kitchen equipment, feature finishes5- or 15-yearCommercial fit-out and business equipment may qualify depending on whether items are tenant-specific and removable rather than building structure.
Upper-floor residential finishes — unit flooring, cabinetry, appliances5-yearResidential unit finishes may qualify depending on how they are installed; the split is applied conservatively and depends on the facts of attachment.
Shared parking & podium — structured or grade parking serving both uses15- or 39-yearParking classification depends on whether it is a surface land improvement versus structural podium integral to the building.
Common-area finishes — lobby, corridor and amenity flooring, décor lighting5- or 15-yearCommon-area décor finishes and non-general lighting may qualify depending on function and permanence.
Site improvements — plaza paving, landscaping, exterior lighting, signage15-yearSite elements are generally land improvements depending on their separation from the building and permanence.
Supplemental & tenant HVAC — restaurant make-up air, retail dedicated units5-yearConditioning dedicated to a specific commercial tenant load may qualify depending on whether it serves equipment or the building.
The one thing to know about mixed-use: The result is a weighted blend, not a single rate. A retail- or restaurant-heavy ground floor lifts the whole building because commercial fit-out is short-life-rich; residential-heavy upper floors keep it conservative. The honest number comes from segregating each use, classifying it on its own merits, and blending by gross building area — and from keeping the residential split disciplined rather than optimistic.

2Typical results and what drives the spread

Across standardized mixed-use configurations, the engine models an accelerated share of roughly 5–32% (central tendency near ~12%). Where a building lands in the 5–32% modeled range (central tendency near 12%) depends on the mix: more commercial and restaurant area moves it up, more residential area moves it down. These are modeled ranges, not a promise for any specific building — see by the numbers.

3By the numbers (original data)

The accelerated-% range on this page is an internal model range: generated by running Cost Seg Smart's commercial component engine across standardized mixed-use configurations. It is not a summary of completed client studies, and it is not a prediction for your building. Actual results depend on the property's facts, documentation and your CPA's positions.

4What a study costs for this type

Study fees track building size, documentation quality and whether an on-site inspection is performed. Cost Seg Smart's own fee for this type starts at From $1,995 (published, pulled from its pricing system). See the pricing guide for current market bands; competitor fees are sourced there, not quoted in prose here.

5Provider comparison — the Top 5 for this asset class

Every provider below is scored on the same fixed rubric, weighting relevant mixed-use evidence most heavily. Facts are drawn from each provider's public materials and dated.

ProviderScore*Relevant mixed-use evidenceProfile
RE Cost Seg
Engineering-first · National (Houston, TX)

Best published pricing
Best for virtual delivery
Most transparent turnaround
7.9
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation3.8/524%18.2
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/530%18.0
Deliverables4.0/514%11.2
Pricing transparency5.0/510%10.0
Delivery options5.0/57%7.0
Audit-support terms5.0/58%8.0
Turnaround transparency5.0/57%7.0
Total100%79.0 → 7.9
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Cost Seg Smart site owner
Engineering-first

Best published pricing
Best for virtual delivery
7.8
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation4.2/524%20.2
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/530%18.0
Deliverables5.0/514%14.0
Pricing transparency5.0/510%10.0
Delivery options4.0/57%5.6
Audit-support terms3.0/58%4.8
Turnaround transparency4.0/57%5.6
Total100%78.0 → 7.8
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Baker Tilly
National accounting/advisory · National (Chicago, IL)

Best for national on-site coverage
Most transparent turnaround
7.6
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation4.2/524%20.2
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/530%18.0
Deliverables5.0/514%14.0
Pricing transparency3.0/510%6.0
Delivery options3.0/57%4.2
Audit-support terms4.0/58%6.4
Turnaround transparency5.0/57%7.0
Total100%76.0 → 7.6
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Source Advisors
Engineering-first · National (Fort Worth, TX)

Best for national on-site coverage
7.3
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation5.0/524%24.0
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/530%18.0
Deliverables5.0/514%14.0
Pricing transparency2.0/510%4.0
Delivery options3.0/57%4.2
Audit-support terms4.0/58%6.4
Turnaround transparency2.0/57%2.8
Total100%73.0 → 7.3
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Cherry Bekaert
Engineering-first · National (Richmond, VA; #1 Southeast)

Best for national on-site coverage
7.2
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation4.6/524%22.1
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/530%18.0
Deliverables4.3/514%12.0
Pricing transparency3.0/510%6.0
Delivery options3.5/57%4.9
Audit-support terms4.0/58%6.4
Turnaround transparency2.0/57%2.8
Total100%72.0 → 7.2
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →

Top 5 of 22 firms scored for mixed-use. See every firm's full profile and per-type standing in the provider directory.

*Score is this site's published rubric output (0–10) for mixed-use, weighting relevant property-type evidence most heavily (see how we compare) — click any score for its build-up. It is not a customer rating and no reviews are used. Cost Seg Smart is the site owner and is scored on the same rubric.

6Is it worth it — break-even

Because the commercial floors can be short-life-rich, the benefit generally clears a study fee once combined basis is in the low seven figures, sooner for restaurant-heavy ground floors and where bonus depreciation still applies to the eligible basis.

7Frequently asked questions

Why is the range for mixed-use so wide?

Because each use classifies differently and the building is a blend. A restaurant or retail ground floor is short-life-rich, while residential upper floors are treated conservatively. The final percentage depends entirely on how much of the gross building area falls into each use.

Can the residential and commercial parts even be studied together?

Yes, but they are analyzed separately and then blended by area. Each use has its own classification logic — commercial fit-out versus residential finishes — and combining them without segregating first would produce a number that is neither defensible nor accurate.

Does a restaurant ground floor really change the outcome that much?

It can. Restaurant build-outs carry dedicated kitchen equipment, make-up air, grease systems, and heavy finishes — a lot of short-life property in a small footprint. A restaurant-anchored ground floor tends to pull the whole building's blended percentage upward.

Why keep the residential split conservative?

Residential finishes classify on their own facts, and overstating that split is exactly where a study loses defensibility. Keeping the residential portion disciplined protects the whole blended result, so the commercial gains are not undermined by an aggressive residential claim.

The building has one parking structure for everyone — how is that handled?

Shared parking is allocated across the uses it serves, and its classification depends on whether it is a surface land improvement or a structural podium integral to the building. A study apportions it rather than assigning it to one use.

Sources and authority consulted

Related guides

All property-type guides → · Pricing · How we compare

Cost Seg Smart, which operates this guide, publishes commercial studies and fees at costsegsmart.com and details its methodology and sample reports at commercialcostseg.com.