Ownership disclosure: this is Cost Seg Smart's own market guide. Cost Seg Smart is evaluated under the same published rubric as every other firm — if another company scores higher, it ranks higher. How we compare →
commercialcostsegreviews.com
Commercial Cost Segregation Market Guide
Pricing, methodology, and provider comparison — by property type.
Edition: July 2026
Next data review: September 2026
Reference work · no ratings · no testimonials
Property type guide

Cost segregation for industrial yards & laydown facilities

An industrial yard is the rare property where there is barely a building to segregate at all. The value is the ground itself — engineered and surfaced for storing pipe, equipment or containers — plus the fencing, lighting, drainage and scales that make raw acreage usable. Almost the entire improved cost is 15-year site work, with a guard shack thrown in.

At a glance
Modeled reclass range20–45%
Typical study fee (Cost Seg Smart)See pricing guide
Recovery periods captured5-, 7- and 15-year vs the 39-year shell
DeliveryEngineering-based; virtual or on-site depending on the provider
Choosing a provider for this asset class?
Top 5 providers for industrial yard / laydowns →

1What reclassifies in a industrial yards & laydown facilities

In a industrial yard / laydown, cost segregation typically reclassifies 20–45% of depreciable basis out of the 39-year building shell into 5-, 7- and 15-year property. The components that recur:

Industrial yard / laydown — commonly reclassified components
ComponentRecovery periodAuthority carried (with caveat)
Heavy laydown surfacing — compacted aggregate, asphalt or reinforced concrete15-yearImproved yard surfacing is generally a land improvement (Asset Class 00.3); it is usually the largest short-life line and scales with treated acreage.
Perimeter fencing, security gates & bollards15-yearSite security improvements are generally land improvements; motorized gate equipment may be §1245 depending on the facts.
Yard & pole lighting15-yearSite lighting serving the yard is generally a land improvement; any building-mounted service wiring is an engineer-review item.
Site drainage, retention & stormwater systems15-yearEngineered drainage and stormwater improvements are generally land improvements; raw grading remains non-depreciable land.
Truck scales & weigh equipment5-yearWeighing equipment serving the yard operation may qualify as §1245 property when it functions as equipment rather than a structural foundation; depends on the facts.
Guard shack / small office structure39-yearA permanent office or guard building generally remains 39-year real property, though a portable/temporary unit may be treated differently depending on the facts.
Raw grading, excavation & underlying landnon-depreciableClearing, rough grading and the land itself are non-depreciable; only the improvements placed on the land generate depreciation.
The one thing to know about industrial yards: There is almost no building here, so the study is really about separating depreciable site improvements from non-depreciable land. Surfacing, fencing, lighting and drainage are 15-year land improvements, but the raw grading and excavation that prepared the parcel stay with the dirt and never depreciate. Drawing that line — improved surface versus prepared ground — is the entire exercise.

2Typical results and what drives the spread

Across standardized industrial yard / laydown configurations, the engine models an accelerated share of roughly 20–45%. Heavily surfaced, fully fenced and lit yards with drainage and scales sit at the top of the range; lightly improved gravel lots with minimal infrastructure sit lower. These are modeled ranges, not a promise for any specific building — see by the numbers.

3By the numbers (original data)

The accelerated-% range on this page is an internal model range: generated by running Cost Seg Smart's commercial component engine across standardized industrial yard / laydown configurations. It is not a summary of completed client studies, and it is not a prediction for your building. Actual results depend on the property's facts, documentation and your CPA's positions.

4What a study costs for this type

Study fees track building size, documentation quality and whether an on-site inspection is performed. See the pricing guide for current market bands; competitor fees are sourced there, not quoted in prose here.

5Provider comparison — the Top 5 for this asset class

Every provider below is scored on the same fixed rubric, weighting relevant industrial yard / laydown evidence most heavily. Facts are drawn from each provider's public materials and dated.

ProviderScore*Relevant industrial yard / laydown evidenceProfile
RE Cost Seg
Engineering-first · National (Houston, TX)

Best published pricing
Best for virtual delivery
Most transparent turnaround
7.9
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation3.8/524%18.2
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/530%18.0
Deliverables4.0/514%11.2
Pricing transparency5.0/510%10.0
Delivery options5.0/57%7.0
Audit-support terms5.0/58%8.0
Turnaround transparency5.0/57%7.0
Total100%79.0 → 7.9
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Cost Seg Smart site owner
Engineering-first

Best published pricing
Best for virtual delivery
7.8
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation4.2/524%20.2
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/530%18.0
Deliverables5.0/514%14.0
Pricing transparency5.0/510%10.0
Delivery options4.0/57%5.6
Audit-support terms3.0/58%4.8
Turnaround transparency4.0/57%5.6
Total100%78.0 → 7.8
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Baker Tilly
National accounting/advisory · National (Chicago, IL)

Best for national on-site coverage
Most transparent turnaround
7.6
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation4.2/524%20.2
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/530%18.0
Deliverables5.0/514%14.0
Pricing transparency3.0/510%6.0
Delivery options3.0/57%4.2
Audit-support terms4.0/58%6.4
Turnaround transparency5.0/57%7.0
Total100%76.0 → 7.6
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Source Advisors
Engineering-first · National (Fort Worth, TX)

Best for national on-site coverage
7.3
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation5.0/524%24.0
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/530%18.0
Deliverables5.0/514%14.0
Pricing transparency2.0/510%4.0
Delivery options3.0/57%4.2
Audit-support terms4.0/58%6.4
Turnaround transparency2.0/57%2.8
Total100%73.0 → 7.3
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Cherry Bekaert
Engineering-first · National (Richmond, VA; #1 Southeast)

Best for national on-site coverage
7.2
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation4.6/524%22.1
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/530%18.0
Deliverables4.3/514%12.0
Pricing transparency3.0/510%6.0
Delivery options3.5/57%4.9
Audit-support terms4.0/58%6.4
Turnaround transparency2.0/57%2.8
Total100%72.0 → 7.2
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →

Top 5 of 22 firms scored for industrial yard / laydown. See every firm's full profile and per-type standing in the provider directory.

*Score is this site's published rubric output (0–10) for industrial yard / laydown, weighting relevant property-type evidence most heavily (see how we compare) — click any score for its build-up. It is not a customer rating and no reviews are used. Cost Seg Smart is the site owner and is scored on the same rubric.

6Is it worth it — break-even

Because so much of an industrial yard's cost is already 15-year site work, a study can move 20–45% of depreciable basis into short-life pools, and the present-value benefit often clears a study fee at a lower basis threshold than building-heavy property — earlier still when bonus depreciation applies to the land improvements. The timing-shift caveat still governs: recapture on a near-term sale erodes the benefit, so a yard held for a quick turn captures less than one held long term.

7Frequently asked questions

If there's almost no building, is a cost segregation study still worthwhile?

Often yes, and sometimes more so. Because most of an industrial yard's improved cost is already 15-year site work, a study can reclassify 20–45% of depreciable basis, and the benefit can clear a study fee at a lower basis than building-heavy property — especially with bonus depreciation on the land improvements.

Doesn't all the grading and dirt work count?

No. Raw grading, excavation and the underlying land are non-depreciable — they stay with the land. Only the engineered improvements placed on it, like surfacing, drainage and fencing, generate depreciation, which is why separating prepared ground from improved surface is the core of the study.

What class does the yard surfacing fall into?

Improved laydown surfacing — compacted aggregate, asphalt or reinforced concrete engineered for load — is generally treated as a 15-year land improvement. It is usually the single largest short-life line and scales with the treated acreage rather than any building footprint.

How is the guard shack or small office handled?

A permanent guard shack or office structure generally remains 39-year real property. A portable or temporary unit may be treated differently depending on the facts, so its classification is reviewed individually rather than assumed.

What pushes a yard toward the high end of the 20–45% range?

Density of improvements. A fully surfaced, fenced, lit and drained yard with truck scales sits near the top, while a lightly improved gravel lot with minimal infrastructure sits lower — because there is simply less depreciable site work to reclassify.

Sources and authority consulted

Related guides

All property-type guides → · Pricing · How we compare

Cost Seg Smart, which operates this guide, publishes commercial studies and fees at costsegsmart.com and details its methodology and sample reports at commercialcostseg.com.