Ownership disclosure: this is Cost Seg Smart's own market guide. Cost Seg Smart is evaluated under the same published rubric as every other firm — if another company scores higher, it ranks higher. How we compare →
commercialcostsegreviews.com
Commercial Cost Segregation Market Guide
Pricing, methodology, and provider comparison — by property type.
Edition: July 2026
Next data review: September 2026
Reference work · no ratings · no testimonials
Property type guide

Cost segregation for motels

The exterior-access format is what makes a motel different to segregate. Guests reach rooms directly from the parking lot along covered walkways and outdoor corridors, so a larger portion of the improvement dollars lives in canopies, railings, walkway structures, and the paved lot rather than an enclosed interior. Those exterior elements are the judgment items: some read as 15-year land improvements, some as building, and the split needs an engineer's eye. Across the format the reclassified share commonly falls in the 18–35% window.

At a glance
Modeled reclass range18–35%
Typical study fee (Cost Seg Smart)See pricing guide
Recovery periods captured5-, 7- and 15-year vs the 39-year shell
DeliveryEngineering-based; virtual or on-site depending on the provider
Choosing a provider for this asset class?
Top 5 providers for motels →

1What reclassifies in a motels

In a motel, cost segregation typically reclassifies 18–35% of depreciable basis out of the 39-year building shell into 5-, 7- and 15-year property. The components that recur:

Motel — commonly reclassified components
ComponentRecovery periodAuthority carried (with caveat)
Room FF&E — beds, case goods, and seating where owned5-yearPersonal property (Asset Class 57.0) tied to unit count; motels often carry a leaner furnishings package than branded hotels, so reconcile to the actual ledger rather than a hotel per-key assumption.
Exterior corridor & walkway canopies and railings15-yearFree-standing canopies, walkway covers, and railings may qualify as land improvements (Asset Class 00.3) where they are site structures rather than part of the building envelope. This is the format's key judgment call and warrants engineer review.
Signage & roadside pylon15-yearLand improvement (Asset Class 00.3) for free-standing monument and pylon structures; illuminated faces can be shorter-life equipment. Separate structure from electronics.
Parking, drive lanes & site paving15-yearLand improvements (Asset Class 00.3) covering the lot and access lanes that front the rooms; scales with site area. The building pad and structural slab stay 39-year.
Pool mechanical equipment5-yearPumps, heaters, and filtration serving the amenity, separate from the pool shell and deck. Present only where a pool exists.
Site & walkway lighting15-yearPole-mounted lot and walkway lighting generally qualifies as land improvement; fixtures wired into the building envelope may follow the structure. The mounting and service path drive the call.
The one thing to know about motels: The exterior-access layout puts unusual weight on the canopies, covered walkways, railings, and lot paving that a guest passes through before ever reaching a room. Those walkway structures are the judgment items — whether they read as 15-year site improvements or as part of the building is an engineer's determination, and it moves the result inside the 18–35% band more than the room furnishings do.

2Typical results and what drives the spread

Across standardized motel configurations, the engine models an accelerated share of roughly 18–35%. Older motels often carry a thin, partly-expensed FF&E package, so the reclassified share leans on the exterior site work; the study reconciles each figure to the property's own records rather than a branded per-key assumption. These are modeled ranges, not a promise for any specific building — see by the numbers.

3By the numbers (original data)

The accelerated-% range on this page is an internal model range: generated by running Cost Seg Smart's commercial component engine across standardized motel configurations. It is not a summary of completed client studies, and it is not a prediction for your building. Actual results depend on the property's facts, documentation and your CPA's positions.

4What a study costs for this type

Study fees track building size, documentation quality and whether an on-site inspection is performed. See the pricing guide for current market bands; competitor fees are sourced there, not quoted in prose here.

5Provider comparison — the Top 5 for this asset class

Every provider below is scored on the same fixed rubric, weighting relevant motel evidence most heavily. Facts are drawn from each provider's public materials and dated.

ProviderScore*Relevant motel evidenceProfile
RE Cost Seg
Engineering-first · National (Houston, TX)

Best published pricing
Best for virtual delivery
Most transparent turnaround
7.9
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation3.8/524%18.2
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/530%18.0
Deliverables4.0/514%11.2
Pricing transparency5.0/510%10.0
Delivery options5.0/57%7.0
Audit-support terms5.0/58%8.0
Turnaround transparency5.0/57%7.0
Total100%79.0 → 7.9
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Cost Seg Smart site owner
Engineering-first

Best published pricing
Best for virtual delivery
7.8
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation4.2/524%20.2
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/530%18.0
Deliverables5.0/514%14.0
Pricing transparency5.0/510%10.0
Delivery options4.0/57%5.6
Audit-support terms3.0/58%4.8
Turnaround transparency4.0/57%5.6
Total100%78.0 → 7.8
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Baker Tilly
National accounting/advisory · National (Chicago, IL)

Best for national on-site coverage
Most transparent turnaround
7.6
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation4.2/524%20.2
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/530%18.0
Deliverables5.0/514%14.0
Pricing transparency3.0/510%6.0
Delivery options3.0/57%4.2
Audit-support terms4.0/58%6.4
Turnaround transparency5.0/57%7.0
Total100%76.0 → 7.6
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Source Advisors
Engineering-first · National (Fort Worth, TX)

Best for national on-site coverage
7.3
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation5.0/524%24.0
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/530%18.0
Deliverables5.0/514%14.0
Pricing transparency2.0/510%4.0
Delivery options3.0/57%4.2
Audit-support terms4.0/58%6.4
Turnaround transparency2.0/57%2.8
Total100%73.0 → 7.3
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →
Cherry Bekaert
Engineering-first · National (Richmond, VA; #1 Southeast)

Best for national on-site coverage
7.2
How this score is built (sub-score ÷ 5 × weight):
Methodology & technical documentation4.6/524%22.1
Relevant property-type evidence3.0/530%18.0
Deliverables4.3/514%12.0
Pricing transparency3.0/510%6.0
Delivery options3.5/57%4.9
Audit-support terms4.0/58%6.4
Turnaround transparency2.0/57%2.8
Total100%72.0 → 7.2
Generic coverage only
source · as of Jul 2026
Profile →

Top 5 of 22 firms scored for motel. See every firm's full profile and per-type standing in the provider directory.

*Score is this site's published rubric output (0–10) for motel, weighting relevant property-type evidence most heavily (see how we compare) — click any score for its build-up. It is not a customer rating and no reviews are used. Cost Seg Smart is the site owner and is scored on the same rubric.

6Is it worth it — break-even

The present-value benefit generally clears a study fee once depreciable basis reaches the low-to-mid seven figures, with the exterior site work supplying much of the shorter-life basis. It is weakest on a short hold, where §1245 recapture on furnishings at a near-term sale gives back much of the timing gain.

7Frequently asked questions

What makes a motel study different from a hotel study?

The exterior-access format. Because guests reach rooms from the lot along covered walkways, more of the improvement dollars sit in canopies, railings, walkway structures, and paving — potential 15-year land improvements — rather than an enclosed interior. That shifts where the reclassified value comes from within the 18–35% band.

Are the covered walkways and canopies really faster-depreciating?

They may qualify as 15-year land improvements where they function as free-standing site structures rather than part of the building envelope. This is the format's central judgment call, and it depends on how the walkway ties into the building, so it warrants engineer review rather than a blanket assumption.

Our motel furniture is old — does that reduce the benefit?

It can. If much of the original FF&E has already been depreciated or expensed, less furnishings basis remains to reclassify, so the study leans more on the exterior site work. The figure is reconciled to your actual records rather than a branded per-key spec.

Does the parking lot depreciate separately from the building?

Generally yes. Site paving, drive lanes, and curbing are typically 15-year land improvements, distinct from the 39-year building. On the exterior-access format the lot fronts the rooms directly and can carry a meaningful share of the improvement basis.

How does recapture affect a motel sale?

Gain attributable to the reclassified §1245 personal property, mainly furnishings, is generally recaptured as ordinary income on sale, while §1250 building gain is treated separately. A longer hold preserves the timing benefit; a near-term sale erodes it.

Sources and authority consulted

Related guides

All property-type guides → · Pricing · How we compare

Cost Seg Smart, which operates this guide, publishes commercial studies and fees at costsegsmart.com and details its methodology and sample reports at commercialcostseg.com.